Comments on: We Have All heard Those Words

By: Neli

Neli — Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:44:12 +0000

I repect y0ur 0pini0n greatly and as equally as I d0 every0nes. I h0pe we’ll stay in t0uch s0 that I can at a m0re appr0priate age (f0r y0u) share my 0pini0ns 0n L0ve (which I am c0nvinced won’t change). Thank y0u f0r reading the article th0ugh, y0ur 0pini0n was a breath 0f fresh air =)

0ne request th0ugh…y0u speak 0f “experience” and h0w y0u “d0n’t d0 well with L0ve”…a bit 0f an ir0ny that y0u’d feel a bit m0re “mature” to give guidance 0n s0mething that y0u are n0t very articulate with…n0ne the less, when given an ultimatum…to either walk a path walked by an0ther 0r walk thr0ugh the r0ugh r0ad t0 make y0ur 0wn path, which w0uld y0u ch00se?

By: Tuelo (A sense)

Tuelo (A sense) — Mon, 06 Sep 2010 08:12:25 +0000

George Bailey, I respect your comment, but what i dont like about it is you using your age as a measure of how appropriate or not your views are. As you said, “Life is all about interaction, Love is all about interaction” Your views are different to the author’s and no matter how young she is, the views are different. and hence we interact. I do acknowledge the value and substance of age and experience, but with all due respect, you don’t know her experience. A matter is at hand, discuss it using facts and perspective, don’t come into a discussion and presume that because of your experiences, your comment holds a greater substance. Again, no disrespect, I agree with your comment, but like i said, do not belittle the author. She shared genuine views, and her views are relevant to the whole love cliche scenario. I enjoyed reading her article and she shared great views, as young as she is.

By: George Bailey

George Bailey — Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:32:21 +0000

Love is not a concept, or a state of mind, though that is closer. It is a chemical imbalance in the brain caused by a specific set of circumstances. I don’t do well with love, but you are young and still seeking. I prefer a nice arrangement based on lust and common cause. I prefer the ‘damsel in distress’ for I can elevate her by my actions. Life is about interaction, love is an interaction and not something sacred or transcendant. It is created, and will never last… but it mutates into a symbiosis if treated well. God is pretty smart.

By: luthando madondo

luthando madondo — Thu, 05 Aug 2010 19:05:15 +0000

@Neli, thanx. Hope youll grow from strength 2 strength. All of the best, may you continue 2 walk steadfastly along da path nd develop towards a broader article base.

By: luthando madondo

luthando madondo — Thu, 05 Aug 2010 19:04:43 +0000

@Neli, thanx. Hope youll grow from strength 2 strength. All of the best, may you continue 2 walk steadfastly along da path nd develop towards broader article base.

By: Neli

Neli — Thu, 05 Aug 2010 10:34:45 +0000

@Luthando, l0l, it takes a l0t m0re t0 0ffend me…that means I’m n0t 0ffended at all (in case y0u read that ‘wr0ng’ t00, l0l, just kidding =P). I just prefer it if pe0ple read my articles with m0re 0f an 0pen mind, because it then makes it easy t0 put what I write ab0ut in c0ntext. I just write…n0 audience in mind s0 I d0n’t think trying t0 make what I write suit y0ur kind 0f lifestyle w0uld be t00 much 0f a great idea. Again, thanks f0r reading the article, it’s greatly appreciated =)

By: luthando madondo

luthando madondo — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:27:38 +0000

Hey, Neli … i need 2 apologise 4 da ambiguity in my cOmment. i ges its arrangement was a bit overlapping. Thing is when i said (includin U), one wasnt dissociatin U 4rm any circle was merely aiming 2 centralise the comment. i truly am sori if my utterance has offended U. Da part bOwt da parents past, was entirely based on my encounter. i mererly used da word ‘we’ 2 upscale da focus, am also sori 4 sounding out of line on that part…

By: Neli

Neli — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:56:45 +0000

sowwy for the d0uble c0mment and all the spelling mistakes (l0l), my internet c0nnecti0n is currently very bad =)

By: Neli

Neli — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:52:21 +0000

@Lingiwe, please n0te my last descripti0n pertaining t0 what L0ve is t0 me…”Unfortunately I do not have an answer to that because Love, to me is too complex a decision, not a sensation or an ecstasy. It’s a decision which endures anything and everything if made from the heart; it’s comparable to the sound of thought, the texture of a dream…and the birth and growth of time…”…n0w c0rrect me if I’m wrong but that means I cann0t c0ndense it t0 w0rds right?

@Luthando…I’m c0nfused as t0 what gives y0u the impressi0n that I exclude myself fr0m L0ve? I d0 n0t, hence the explanation of my feelings towards the anecd0te ab0ut my female friend wh0 believed I was “removed fr0m L0ve”. With reference to my parents. What I cann0t d0 is separate myself fr0m my past because I believe that the past is like a flexible cast…please d0 n0t mistake this with the idea that I mean “reference p0int t0 blame” when I say “cast”…I simply mean that I cann0t be wh0 I currently am, in the present if I have n0 f0rm 0f reference t0 draw fr0m…that means thatthe past acts as a teacher t0 the present…a teacher teaches y0u things, and the teacher isn’t always right, but it is y0ur decisi0n t0 rem0ld the cast…and that’s where blame c0mes in. I have rem0lded my cast, if I hadn’t thean h0w w0uld I have been inL0ve at this present m0ment? =)…I think y0u sh0uld try and read my articles with m0re 0f an 0pen mind next time…I L0ve my past and I w0uldn’t change anything ab0ut it because it has “m0lded” me int0 the w0men 0f sibstance that I am t0day…I appreciate everything that deserves t0 be appreciated…even the negative =)

By: Neli

Neli — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:39:49 +0000